- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:17:20 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com>
- Cc: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 08:55 +0000, Phil Archer wrote: > I'd be happy enough to see greater granularity for rdfs:seeAlso. I > have a use case where I want to say something like "the <uri> has been > minted recently by a source that is not authoritative but that, if > widely adopted, could become so. Either way, it's worth noting that he > and I are talking about the same thing" - and rdfs:seeAlso doesn't > really cover that nuance! @prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . @prefix uri: <http://purl.org/NET/uri#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . <foo> rdfs:seeAlso <http://example.com/bar> . <http://example.com/bar> uri:identifier [ uri:literal "http://example.com/bar"^^xsd:anyURI ; dc:issued "2011-01-08"^^xsd:date ; u:policy _:ExampleDotComUriPolicy ; u:assigned_by <http://example.com/alice#me> ] . _:ExampleDotComUriPolicy rdfs:comment "These URIs are not authoritative, but may become so."@en . -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 10 January 2011 13:18:16 UTC