- From: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:36:43 +0300
- To: Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com>
- Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, nathan@webr3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Чтв, 2011-01-13 at 11:04 +0000, Phil Archer wrote: > Describing a URI with further triples is good, nothing wrong with that, > but to use that to decide whether or not to dereference an rdfs:seeAlso > URI means looking for a description of the linked resource and then > acting accordingly. That sounds like a relatively heavy bit of > processing that HTTP kind of takes care of for you. Phil, how then do you propose to deal with the following: - RDFa - web servers that (in full compliance with the spec[1]) ignore the Accept header and just send 200 with the only representation they have (try HEAD http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html with Accept: application/rdf+xml, pay attention to the Content-Length returned) [1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.4.7 -- Vasiliy Faronov
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 11:37:19 UTC