- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:05:33 +0000
- To: Nuno Bettencourt <nuno.bett@gmail.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Nuno Bettencourt wrote: > Hi, > > The doubt just kept on because in all protocols we were still referring to the same URN. do you mean that there were RDF statements which linked each of the protocol specific URIs to a single URN via the same property? eg: <http://...> x:foo <urn:here> <https://...> x:foo <urn:here> <ftp://...> x:foo <urn:here> If so, then you could define the property (x:foo above) as an Inverse Functional Property which would take care of the sameness for you. Best, Nathan
Received on Monday, 17 January 2011 18:06:20 UTC