- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:27:10 +0000
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Dave Reynolds wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 11:43 +0000, Nathan wrote: > >> "linked data" is not some term for data with links, it's an engineered >> protocol which has constraints and requirements to make the whole thing >> work. > > Where is the spec for this "engineered protocol" and where in that spec > does it redefine rdfs:seeAlso? > > [I believe I have reasonably decent understanding of, and experience > with, linked data. It is a useful set of conventions and practices > building on some underlying formal specifications. However, I'm not > aware of those practices being so universally agreed and formally > codified as to justify some of the claims being made in this thread.] Hence my comment: "Perhaps this points to a need to standardize Linked Data as a protocol." Best, Nathan
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:29:15 UTC