- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:16:15 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com>
- CC: William Waites <ww@styx.org>, Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org
Phil Archer wrote: > On the Web in general, URIs don't, or certainly shouldn't, imply any > particular content type. They don't imply anything, they name things, and the thing that's named can by all means be a representation with a specific mediatype, infact this is by far the most common usage of URIs, and always has been.
Received on Monday, 10 January 2011 14:18:02 UTC