public-ixml@w3.org from December 2021 by date

Friday, 31 December 2021

• clarification (I hope) - using catalog.xml and the other ixml-tests catalogs C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: test packages using ixml-tests catalog files, for Steven's tests and syntaxtests collections C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Does ixml have to match the whole input? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Does ixml have to match the whole input? John Lumley
• Re: Does ixml have to match the whole input? Steven Pemberton
• Re: eof and ws? Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: eof and ws? Dave Pawson
• Re: eof and ws? Norm Tovey-Walsh
• eof and ws? Dave Pawson
• Does ixml have to match the whole input? Norm Tovey-Walsh
• test packages using ixml-tests catalog files, for Steven's tests and syntaxtests collections C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 29 December 2021

• Re: Running ixml from the command line Steven Pemberton
• Re: Running ixml from the command line Dave Pawson
• Running ixml from the command line Steven Pemberton

Tuesday, 28 December 2021

• Change in live version of ixml processor Steven Pemberton

Monday, 27 December 2021

• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml Steven Pemberton
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml Steven Pemberton
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml Steven Pemberton
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml Steven Pemberton
• Re: Serialization of dchar and schar Steven Pemberton
• Serialization of dchar and schar Norm Tovey-Walsh

Sunday, 26 December 2021

• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Saturday, 25 December 2021

• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml John Lumley
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml Liam R. E. Quin

Friday, 24 December 2021

• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Representation of strings and characters in XML version of ixml Steven Pemberton
• Re: meta-question: how should we handle discussion of test cases? Steven Pemberton

Thursday, 23 December 2021

• comments in attributes C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: meta-question: how should we handle discussion of test cases? Norm Tovey-Walsh
• meta-question: how should we handle discussion of test cases? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 22 December 2021

• Re: ixml and non-xml output - is there an error and if so where? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• structure of a test suite (was Re: ixml and non-xml output - is there an error and if so where?) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: ixml and non-xml output - is there an error and if so where? Steven Pemberton
• Re: ixml and non-xml output - is there an error and if so where? Dave Pawson
• Re: ixml and non-xml output - is there an error and if so where? Steven Pemberton

Tuesday, 21 December 2021

• ixml and non-xml output - is there an error and if so where? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Test suite structure Steven Pemberton
• Re: Test suite structure Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: Test suite structure Dave Pawson
• Test suite structure Steven Pemberton
• Re: Action 2021-12-14: Steven to add his tests to github Steven Pemberton

Monday, 20 December 2021

• Re: Disallowed characters in XML Gryk, Michael Robert
• Re: Disallowed characters in XML Dave Pawson

Sunday, 19 December 2021

• Disallowed characters in XML Steven Pemberton
• Re: Action 2021-12-14: Steven to add his tests to github Dave Pawson

Saturday, 18 December 2021

• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) John Lumley
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Dave Pawson

Friday, 17 December 2021

• Action 2021-12-14: Steven to add his tests to github Steven Pemberton
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Steven Pemberton
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Dave Pawson
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Dave Pawson
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Steven Pemberton
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Dave Pawson

Thursday, 16 December 2021

• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Steven Pemberton
• Re: On the subject of rewriting Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Dave Pawson
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) Dave Pawson
• *which* alternative that matches nothing? (was Re: repetition) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: On the subject of rewriting C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• On the subject of rewriting Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: repetition Dave Pawson
• Re: repetition Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: repetition Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: repetition Dave Pawson
• Re: repetition Dave Pawson
• Re: repetition Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: repetition Tom Hillman
• repetition Dave Pawson

Wednesday, 15 December 2021

• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Tuesday, 14 December 2021

• Minutes ixml community group meeting 14 December 2021 Steven Pemberton
• Re: Requirements & pragma proposal Tomos Hillman
• Re: Requirements & pragma proposal Tom Hillman
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review Dave Pawson
• Re: Requirements & pragma proposal C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: ACTION (2021-08-004): Steven to create list of existing requirements Steven Pemberton
• Re: Requirements & pragma proposal Dave Pawson
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review Dave Pawson
• Requirements & pragma proposal Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review John Lumley
• Re: ACTION (2021-08-004): Steven to create list of existing requirements Tom Hillman
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review Tom Hillman
• ACTION (2021-08-004): Steven to create list of existing requirements Steven Pemberton
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review Steven Pemberton
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review Dave Pawson

Monday, 13 December 2021

• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Re: Pragma Proposal ready for review C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• draft agenda for ixml community group meeting 14 December 2021 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Tuesday, 7 December 2021

• Pragma Proposal ready for review Tom Hillman

Saturday, 4 December 2021

• Re: desiderata for the schema(s) for ixml grammars in XML C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: desiderata for the schema(s) for ixml grammars in XML Dave Pawson
• desiderata for the schema(s) for ixml grammars in XML C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Friday, 3 December 2021

• Re: Conformance section C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Conformance section C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: Conformance section John Lumley
• Re: Conformance section Norm Tovey-Walsh
• Conformance section Steven Pemberton

Thursday, 2 December 2021

• Re: "Hints for implementors" section C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: "Hints for implementors" section Tomos Hillman
• Re: "Hints for implementors" section John Lumley
• "Hints for implementors" section Steven Pemberton

Last message date: Friday, 31 December 2021 17:58:34 UTC