- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:54:52 +0000
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
On Wednesday 22 December 2021 15:53:11 (+01:00), Dave Pawson wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 at 14:43, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > > > > What you are proposing I think is a sixth: > > > > 6. ixml grammar correct, test completes correctly, resulting XML is in error as a result of authoring errors. > > Another view, this could be classed as being a scoping issue? > How far (either direction) should ixml detect / report errors? > When does 'hand holding' stop and an error is classified as a user error? Yes, that is what I meant with "it is the author's responsibility". Steven > > Is it reasonable to define boundaries for ixml concerns? > Character based errors might fall into this category too. > > regards > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2021 14:55:16 UTC