- From: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 11:08:30 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
I would argue that some form of encouragement to accept the grammar in an XML form should be retained. My experimentation on XPath.ixml with the ‘tree-reduction’ pragma, being pre-processed via a parse and subsequent XSLT transform, yields an intermediate XML form of the final grammar, for which it is somewhat wasteful to have to serialize to text and then have the IXML processor re-parse…. John Sent from my iPad > On 3 Dec 2021, at 10:40, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > > An option would be "A conforming processor must accept grammars in ixml form, and should accept them in XML form, and use them ..." Do we have an opinion?
Received on Friday, 3 December 2021 11:08:46 UTC