- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:21:57 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2021 16:23:20 UTC
Explain how 1 and 4 are different please Steven? Is 1 syntax of ixml error? 4 ‘invalid’ (xml terminology) Seems a good split to me Regards On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 16:18, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > I had split my test set two ways, but do we think it's worth doing a > multi-way split? > 1. ixml grammar syntax errors > 2. ixml grammar semantic errors > 3. ixml grammar correct, input and grammar don't match > 4. ixml grammar correct, input is ambiguous > 5. ixml grammar correct, test completes correctly > > Any others? > > Steven > > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2021 16:23:20 UTC