- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:31:20 +0000
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2021 16:31:39 UTC
Explain how 1 and 4 are different please Steven? 1. ixml grammar syntax errors The grammar contains errors, so that it can't be further processed. For instance unterminates strings, missing commas or full stops. 4. ixml grammar correct, input is ambiguous The grammar contains no errors. Consequent use of it to parse the (non-xml) input reveals multiple possible parses. Steven Is 1 syntax of ixml error? 4 ‘invalid’ (xml terminology) Seems a good split to me Regards On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 16:18, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: I had split my test set two ways, but do we think it's worth doing a multi-way split? Any others? Steven -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2021 16:31:39 UTC