- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 13:08:27 +0000
- To: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m2ee6c7kyq.fsf@saxonica.com>
Hello,
As I was looking at rewriting to ease implementation, I happened to
notice that the ixml grammar for ixml contains a few places where an
“alts” contains a single “alt”.
Is it safe to simplify that construction? For example, consider:
<rule name='alt'>
<alt>
<repeat0>
<nonterminal name='term'/>
<sep>
<alts>
<alt>
<literal tmark='-' dstring=','/>
<nonterminal name='s'/>
</alt>
</alts>
</sep>
</repeat0>
</alt>
</rule>
It feels like that should be the same as:
<rule name='alt'>
<alt>
<repeat0>
<nonterminal name='term'/>
<sep>
<literal tmark='-' dstring=','/>
<nonterminal name='s'/>
</sep>
</repeat0>
</alt>
</rule>
But I’ve been unable to prove that to myself in the general case. Is it
ever wrong to remove an “alts” that contains a single alternative?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2021 13:12:14 UTC