public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from February 2016 by subject

[dwbp] BP's status

[DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker

[dwbp] Updates on BPs 28 and 29

[dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status

[Minutes] 2016-02-05

[Minutes] 2016-02-12

[Minutes] 2016-02-17

[Minutes] 2016-02-19

Agenda for tomorrow

Agenda for tomorrow's call

Agenda for tomorrow's meeting

BP Doc, Example in Provide structural metadata

Data Quality Vocabulary - feedback welcome!

DataCite to Dublin Core Metadata Application Profile - Google Groups

DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation?

dwbp-ACTION-226: To move the indexes and keep the BP Summary at the top of the doc

dwbp-ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc.

dwbp-ACTION-228: Fix bpconfig.js to restore contributors to bp doc

dwbp-ACTION-229: Send bp editors implementation-questionaire template

dwbp-ACTION-230: Create process for gathering evidence of implementations, e.g. wiki, google form

dwbp-ACTION-231: Talk to eric wilde about open comments and reach resolution

dwbp-ACTION-232: Look into reference to ogc in http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#metadatastandardized (raised during joint call with sdw)

dwbp-ACTION-233: Check if the turtle and rdfa examples are validated

dwbp-ACTION-234: Check if the turtle and rdfa examples are validated

dwbp-ACTION-235: Review annette's test for bp8

dwbp-ACTION-236: Review the voc aspect of bp9

dwbp-ACTION-237: Email sdw (and dwbp) to ask about their api work (with regard to examples for bp 10)

dwbp-ISSUE-149: How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-232 (MyCity CSV files): Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-239 (Laufer): machine-readable standardized data formats - serialization data formats - dataset formats [Best practices document(s)]

dwbp-ISSUE-242 (Laufer): APIs on the Web (for publishing Data on the Web) Best Practices [Best practices document(s)]

Invitation to join a Spatial data WG call

ISSUE-240: To consider a new bp around numeric accuracy. comes from sdw's concern about useless extra decmimal places

ISSUE-241: Consider the granularity of data when providing an api. is the api necessary to every kind of data, is it only for small pieces of data, for huge datasets?

Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow

Language properties - eating one's own dog food

Misleading definitions of dqv properties

New styles from 1 March

New WebEx details

Questions about provenance BP 6

Regrets for missing meeting...

Regrets Re: Agenda for tomorrow

Review of example data in BP8 and BP9

some thoughts on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/222

Update DWBP Best Practice "Use Standardized terms" - feedback from SDW WG

Zagreb hotels

Last message date: Monday, 29 February 2016 15:54:15 UTC