Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation?

Hi Ghislain,

Well spotted for dqv:hasQualityMeasurement.
I really think we should change dqv:QualityMeasureDataset. It is the easiest one to change (its existence is still actually questioned, see ISSUE-181 [1]). And havine heterogneity in our choice between measure and measurement would only confuse would-be users of the vocabulary, I'm afraid.

Cheers,

Antoine

[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/181

On 2/19/16 5:32 PM, Ghislain Atemezing wrote:
> Hello Antoine, all
>
> [ My 2 cents below ]
>> Le 19 févr. 2016 à 17:16, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> a écrit :
>>
>> Their preferences goes to 'measurement', if they have to pick among the options on this thread.
>>
>> So we will replace dqv:QualityMeasure by dqv:QualityMeasurement. Unless someone who was not on the call raises a strong (and quick) objection!
>
> +1 dqv:QualityMeasurement.
> However, I don’t see the point to change also dqv:QualityMeasureDataset.  Rather, I’d see the change in the property dqv:hasQualityMeasurement.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Ghislain
> ---------------------------------------
> Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
> Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com <mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com>
> Web:https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org>
> Twitter: @gatemezing
> About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>