Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation?

Hi Antoine, 
> Le 19 févr. 2016 à 17:43, Antoine Isaac <> a écrit :
> I really think we should change dqv:QualityMeasureDataset. It is the easiest one to change (its existence is still actually questioned, see ISSUE-181 [1]).

I see your point. I’m not fan of long “names” for classes. That’s just subjective. 
> And havine heterogneity in our choice between measure and measurement would only confuse would-be users of the vocabulary, I'm afraid.

Just for curiosity: Are there any studies on how confused are users of vocabularies in the names picked by the creators? I’d love to have such pointers. 



Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
Web: <>
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: <>

Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 17:06:11 UTC