Hi Antoine, > Le 19 févr. 2016 à 17:43, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> a écrit : > > I really think we should change dqv:QualityMeasureDataset. It is the easiest one to change (its existence is still actually questioned, see ISSUE-181 [1]). I see your point. I’m not fan of long “names” for classes. That’s just subjective. > And havine heterogneity in our choice between measure and measurement would only confuse would-be users of the vocabulary, I'm afraid. Just for curiosity: Are there any studies on how confused are users of vocabularies in the names picked by the creators? I’d love to have such pointers. Cheers, Ghislain --------------------------------------- Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/> Twitter: @gatemezing About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>
Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 17:06:11 UTC