- From: Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:10:27 +0100
- To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Cc: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <56C349F3.3080307@nic.br>
Hi Ricardo, Thanks for working on that :-) We're using HTML+RDFa to display the human-readable examples on the page [1]. I just added IDs to the sections to make possible the use of fragments on the URL of human-readable examples. For the other examples you mention, I think we could link to the specific section on the DQV doc instead of having the content duplicated on both documents. Is it make sense? cheers, Newton [1]: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html Em 12/02/16 15:02, Riccardo Albertoni escreveu: > Dear Berna, Carol Newton, and Antoine > > I have revised the example for Best Practice 7: Provide data quality > information, you can find my revision already included in Github. > > I have not yet worked much on the human readable part of the > aforementioned example, > Could you confirm that the human readable part expected to be added > to the dwbp-example-html page, and we are using HTML/RDFa in it? > > > In theory we might consider to include other examples from DQV, in > particular, I am thinking to the following > > -Express that a dataset received an ODI certificate, > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#odiCert > -Express the conformance of a dataset's metadata with a standard, > http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#ExpressConformanceWithStandard > > But I am not sure that such a content replication between DQV and BP > documents makes any sense, what do you think? > > > Best Riccardo > > > On 5 February 2016 at 19:28, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br > <mailto:newton@nic.br>> wrote: > > Dear all, > > thank you for the call today, it was very helpful to have your > agreement to the assigned BPs. Thank you all for contributing :-) > > We updated the table [1] and there are still two BPs without > member assignments to take care of, so we kindly ask the group if > there are volunteers to work on the BP 6: Provide data provenance > information <http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#DataProvenance> and > BP 27: Assess dataset coverage > <http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#EvaluateCoverage>. > > cheers, > Berna, Carol and Newton > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp-status.html > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > *E.F.A. Project* <http://www.efa-project.org>, and is believed to > be clean. > > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico > Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it > <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: _http://www.imati.cnr.it/_ > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2016 16:37:56 UTC