W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation?

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:32:09 +0100
Cc: "jeremy.debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de" <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>, Giancarlo Guizzardi <gguizzardi@gmail.com>, Riccardo Albertoni <riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A533A664-3D18-4883-ADDB-F05AEC39A81E@eurecom.fr>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Hello Antoine, all 

[ My 2 cents below ] 
> Le 19 févr. 2016 à 17:16, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> a écrit :
> Their preferences goes to 'measurement', if they have to pick among the options on this thread.
> So we will replace dqv:QualityMeasure by dqv:QualityMeasurement. Unless someone who was not on the call raises a strong (and quick) objection!

+1 dqv:QualityMeasurement. 
However, I don’t see the point to change also dqv:QualityMeasureDataset.  Rather, I’d see the change in the property dqv:hasQualityMeasurement.


Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/>
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>

Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 16:32:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:44 UTC