public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from February 2016 by date

Monday, 29 February 2016

• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Riccardo Albertoni

Sunday, 28 February 2016

• Update DWBP Best Practice "Use Standardized terms" - feedback from SDW WG Antoine Isaac

Friday, 26 February 2016

• Re: Review of example data in BP8 and BP9 Annette Greiner
• Questions about provenance BP 6 Antoine Isaac
• Language properties - eating one's own dog food Antoine Isaac
• Review of example data in BP8 and BP9 Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ACTION-237: Email sdw (and dwbp) to ask about their api work (with regard to examples for bp 10) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-236: Review the voc aspect of bp9 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-235: Review annette's test for bp8 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-233: Check if the turtle and rdfa examples are validated Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-234: Check if the turtle and rdfa examples are validated Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Regrets Re: Agenda for tomorrow Eric Stephan

Thursday, 25 February 2016

• New WebEx details Phil Archer
• Agenda for tomorrow Hadley Beeman
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-228: Fix bpconfig.js to restore contributors to bp doc Phil Archer

Wednesday, 24 February 2016

• Re: dwbp-ACTION-228: Fix bpconfig.js to restore contributors to bp doc Newton Calegari

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

• Re: [dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: [dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status Newton Calegari

Friday, 19 February 2016

• Regrets for missing meeting... Eric Stephan
• [Minutes] 2016-02-19 Phil Archer
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Antoine Isaac
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Debattista, Jeremy
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Antoine Isaac
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Giancarlo Guizzardi
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: DataCite to Dublin Core Metadata Application Profile - Google Groups Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• DataCite to Dublin Core Metadata Application Profile - Google Groups Andrea Perego
• New styles from 1 March Phil Archer
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Antoine Isaac
• DQV terminology - Quality Measure, Measurement, Observation? Antoine Isaac

Thursday, 18 February 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-02-17 Phil Archer
• Re: [dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status Riccardo Albertoni
• dwbp-ISSUE-242 (Laufer): APIs on the Web (for publishing Data on the Web) Best Practices [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 17 February 2016

• ISSUE-241: Consider the granularity of data when providing an api. is the api necessary to every kind of data, is it only for small pieces of data, for huge datasets? Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-240: To consider a new bp around numeric accuracy. comes from sdw's concern about useless extra decmimal places Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-232: Look into reference to ogc in http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#metadatastandardized (raised during joint call with sdw) Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow Laufer
• Re: Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow Antoine Isaac
• dwbp-ISSUE-239 (Laufer): machine-readable standardized data formats - serialization data formats - dataset formats [Best practices document(s)] Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow yaso
• some thoughts on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/222 Riccardo Albertoni
• [dwbp] Updates on BPs 28 and 29 Newton Calegari
• Re: Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow Caroline Burle
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Riccardo Albertoni

Tuesday, 16 February 2016

• Re: Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: [dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: [dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status Newton Calegari
• Re: Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow Phil Archer
• Joint Meeting with SDW tomorrow Phil Archer
• [DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Friday, 12 February 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-02-12 Phil Archer
• dwbp-ACTION-231: Talk to eric wilde about open comments and reach resolution Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-230: Create process for gathering evidence of implementations, e.g. wiki, google form Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-229: Send bp editors implementation-questionaire template Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: [dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status Riccardo Albertoni
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Riccardo Albertoni

Thursday, 11 February 2016

• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Debattista, Jeremy
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Antoine Isaac
• Agenda for tomorrow's meeting Deirdre Lee
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Riccardo Albertoni

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

• Re: Data Quality Vocabulary - feedback welcome! Riccardo Albertoni

Monday, 8 February 2016

• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Debattista, Jeremy
• Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties Riccardo Albertoni
• Misleading definitions of dqv properties Debattista, Jeremy
• BP Doc, Example in Provide structural metadata Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-149: How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner

Saturday, 6 February 2016

• Re: [Minutes] 2016-02-05 Bernadette Farias Lóscio
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-149: How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? [Best practices document(s)] Bernadette Farias Lóscio

Friday, 5 February 2016

• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-149: How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? [Best practices document(s)] Annette Greiner
• [dwbp] Updating contributors on the BP-status Newton Calegari
• Re: [Minutes] 2016-02-05 Eric Stephan
• [Minutes] 2016-02-05 Phil Archer
• dwbp-ACTION-228: Fix bpconfig.js to restore contributors to bp doc Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• dwbp-ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-232 (MyCity CSV files): Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example [Best practices document(s)] Phil Archer
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-232 (MyCity CSV files): Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example [Best practices document(s)] Newton Calegari
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-149: How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? [Best practices document(s)] Newton Calegari
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-226: To move the indexes and keep the BP Summary at the top of the doc Newton Calegari
• dwbp-ACTION-226: To move the indexes and keep the BP Summary at the top of the doc Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 4 February 2016

• Agenda for tomorrow's call yaso
• [dwbp] BP's status Newton Calegari

Wednesday, 3 February 2016

• Re: Zagreb hotels yaso
• Zagreb hotels Phil Archer

Tuesday, 2 February 2016

• Re: Invitation to join a Spatial data WG call Laufer

Monday, 1 February 2016

• Re: Invitation to join a Spatial data WG call Caroline Burle

Last message date: Monday, 29 February 2016 15:54:15 UTC