Re: Misleading definitions of dqv properties

Hi all,

 Nandana and Jeremy seems to converge to isMeasureOf, for me is ok.
@Antoine: Shall we agree on isMeasureOf ?

just to be ready for proposing a vote and close issue 231 :)

Cheers,
Riccardo



On 12 February 2016 at 12:47, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just looking at how they sound,
>
> (1.a) _:measure1 dqv:isMeasureOf _:metricA
> (1.b) _:measure1 dqv:evaluatesMetric _:metricA
> (1.c) _:measure1 dqv:computedMetric _:metricA
> (1.d) _:metricA dqv:hasMeasure _:measure1
>
> I also think isMeasureOf and evaluatesMetric are good options. I slightly
> prefer isMeasureOf because it sounds a bit more consistent with the
> dqv:QualityMeasure.
>
> Best Regards,
> Nandana
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> *E.F.A. Project* <http://www.efa-project.org>, and is believed to be
> clean.
>



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.ge.imati.cnr.it/Albertoni>
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------