- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:27:43 +0100
- To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- CC: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ghislain, No, I don't know such studies! But I guess users of vocabularies are generally baffled by the heterogeneity of terminological choices and naming conventions. At least I am ;-) Antoine On 2/19/16 6:05 PM, Ghislain Atemezing wrote: > Hi Antoine, >> Le 19 févr. 2016 à 17:43, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> a écrit : >> >> I really think we should change dqv:QualityMeasureDataset. It is the easiest one to change (its existence is still actually questioned, see ISSUE-181 [1]). > > I see your point. I’m not fan of long “names” for classes. That’s just subjective. >> And havine heterogneity in our choice between measure and measurement would only confuse would-be users of the vocabulary, I'm afraid. > > Just for curiosity: Are there any studies on how confused are users of vocabularies in the names picked by the creators? I’d love to have such pointers. > > Cheers, > > Ghislain > > --------------------------------------- > Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D > Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com <mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com> > Web:https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org> > Twitter: @gatemezing > About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 17:28:15 UTC