Misleading definitions of dqv properties

• From: Debattista, Jeremy <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
• Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:16:29 +0000
• To: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <1CF18285-FA18-4E75-94BE-F40D9B94AAFC@iais.fraunhofer.de>

Hi Riccardo, Antoine,

I was presenting the DQV and realised that the properties “dqv:hasMetric”, “dqv:hasDimension” and “dqv:hasCategory” are a bit misleading - especially if for example it has to be compared with daQ. I would suggest that they are renamed to “dqv:inDimension” etc… (esp. that they are inverse of daQ properties). 

For example, dqv:hasDimension is defined to be the inverse of daq:hasMetric.. whilst in dqv we also have dqv:hasMetric. This might lead to unnecessary inconsistencies. 

What do you think?

Cheers,
Jer

Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 17:17:26 UTC