Dear DWBP WG members, I would like to point to a specification of possible interest to the WG, released yesterday for public review: https://groups.google.com/a/datacite.org/forum/#!forum/dc2map This work is related to an RDF-based representation of DataCite metadata, and a Dublin Core AP for DataCite. I've not studied it thoroughly, but just at a quick look I identified a few issues that may be relevant to the DWBP BPs. I outline below just two of them: - The RDF profile re-uses quite a few existing vocabularies (e.g., DCTerms/Type, FOAF, CITO, FABIO, FRBR), in addition to defining a new one for some DataCite terms. Strangely, DCAT is not used at all. - The supported identifiers (ORCIDs, ISNIs, DOIs, ARKs, etc.) are not mapped, when possible, to HTTP URIs. Best, Andrea -- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Institute for Environment & Sustainability Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/Received on Friday, 19 February 2016 09:59:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:44 UTC