public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2016 by date

Saturday, 30 January 2016

• Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-95: What should go into which Turtle file? Holger Knublauch
• Re: Constraints metamodel draft Holger Knublauch
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• Any update on ISSUE-92? Holger Knublauch

Friday, 29 January 2016

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] Simon Steyskal
• Re: 3rd UCR WD published! Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Holger Knublauch
• Re: Europeana SHACL tests Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 28 January 2016

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 January 2016 Holger Knublauch
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 January 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• request to be able to push into the test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Europeana SHACL tests Arthur Ryman
• Re: 3rd UCR WD published! Arthur Ryman
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 January 2016 Arthur Ryman
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class Arthur Ryman
• shapes-ISSUE-120 (shape-class-instance-defs): The spec must be more precise and consist about when a resource is a shape, a class, and an instance of a class [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Arthur Ryman
• Europeana SHACL tests Karen Coyle

Wednesday, 27 January 2016

• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 28 January 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 January 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 25 January 2016

• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-23 implicit scopeClass text updated Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Irene Polikoff
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Karen Coyle
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Karen Coyle
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Irene Polikoff

Sunday, 24 January 2016

• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 23 January 2016

• ISSUE-95 Warning Posted :-) Arthur Ryman

Friday, 22 January 2016

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-23 implicit scopeClass text updated Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 Arthur Ryman
• 3rd UCR WD published! Simon Steyskal
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-23 implicit scopeClass text updated Arthur Ryman
• ISSUE-115: Spec updated Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 21 January 2016

• Re: Questions on Use Cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Arthur Ryman

Wednesday, 20 January 2016

• Re: inheritance & reuse Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken
• Questions on Use Cases Karen Coyle
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 January 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: inheritance & reuse Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? Irene Polikoff
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-117 (non-classes as classes): sh:class should not require that its objects be known to be instances of rdfs:Class [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-117 (non-classes as classes): sh:class should not require that its objects be known to be instances of rdfs:Class [SHACL - Core] Arthur Ryman
• Re: ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule Arthur Ryman
• ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 Arthur Ryman
• ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? Arthur Ryman
• Re: inheritance & reuse Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken
• Re: ISSUE-78 Discussions Arthur Ryman

Monday, 18 January 2016

• ISSUE-49 Resolution added to spec Arthur Ryman
• Re: inheritance & reuse Holger Knublauch
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 17 January 2016

• Re: inheritance & reuse Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken

Saturday, 16 January 2016

• Re: inheritance & reuse Holger Knublauch
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 15 January 2016

• inheritance & reuse Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Simon Steyskal
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Holger Knublauch
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Holger Knublauch
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class Holger Knublauch
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 14 January 2016

• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class Holger Knublauch
• Re: ISSUE-115: Did we rush this decision? Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-115: Did we rush this decision? Holger Knublauch
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 14 January 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• automatic checks on github Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 13 January 2016

• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 January 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
• Next version of UCR Karen Coyle

Tuesday, 12 January 2016

• Re: problem with test suite harness Holger Knublauch

Monday, 11 January 2016

• test case approval Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• problem with test suite harness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• shapes-ISSUE-117 (non-classes as classes): sh:class should not require that its objects be known to be instances of rdfs:Class [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
• Call for Exclusions (Update): Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Xueyuan Jia
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Holger Knublauch
• Spec editing "up to date" Holger Knublauch
• ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule Holger Knublauch

Sunday, 10 January 2016

• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Simon Steyskal
• Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 9 January 2016

• ISSUE-104: Implemented resolution Holger Knublauch
• Implemented resolution to ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications) Holger Knublauch
• getting SHACL testing harness to work Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 8 January 2016

• Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Simon Steyskal
• Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Simon Steyskal
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests Simon Steyskal
• Re: followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: definition of validation including scopes and filters arthur.ryman@gmail.com
• definition of validation including scopes and filters Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 7 January 2016

• Re: followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) Arthur Ryman
• Re: AW: SHACL Rules? Arthur Ryman
• Re: followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 January 2015 Arthur Ryman
• Further Response to Eric's Comment on ISSUE-49 Arthur Ryman
• followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) Arthur Ryman
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 January 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
• proposed set of SHACL tests Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-115: Closeness is an aspect of a Shape, but the current syntax treats it like all other constraints. Arthur Ryman
• followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-43) Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: question about ShEx Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about ShEx Iovka Boneva
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 7 January 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 6 January 2016

• complete definition of Shape Expressions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• single-type semantics for ShEx Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 4 January 2016

• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about ShEx Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about ShEx Iovka Boneva
• Re: question about ShEx Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about ShEx Iovka Boneva

Saturday, 2 January 2016

• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

Friday, 1 January 2016

• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

Last message date: Saturday, 30 January 2016 06:49:14 UTC