- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:53:36 -0800
- To: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 01/20/2016 05:53 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote: > For ISSUE-23 read the paragraphs following: > ISSUE 23: Classes and/or Shapes > The remainder of this section is not agreed upon within the SHACL > Working Group. The proposed text was discussed in the WG telecon dated > 2016-01-14. This appears to mean that the only classes that SHACL recognizes are ones in the shapes graph. Is this supposed to be the case uniformly throughout SHACL? The wording is also unique "subclass ... via rdfs:subClassOf". I do not think that this is defined. > For ISSUE-22 read the text following: > A shape may refer to itself directly or indirectly via sh:valueShape, > sh:filterShape, etc This looks better. peter > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider > <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: >> A concise description of where to look for changes would be useful. >> >> peter >> >> >> On 01/19/2016 11:30 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote: >>> I've updated the spec. Please review. >>> >>> -- Arthur >>>
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 18:54:07 UTC