public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from January 2016 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 January 2016 (Thursday, 28 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 28 January 2016 (Wednesday, 27 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 January 2016 (Wednesday, 27 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 January 2015 (Wednesday, 20 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 14 January 2016 (Thursday, 14 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 January 2016 (Wednesday, 13 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 January 2015 (Thursday, 7 January)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 7 January 2016 (Thursday, 7 January)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Europeana SHACL tests (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: 3rd UCR WD published! (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 January 2016 (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23 implicit scopeClass text updated (Monday, 25 January)
• ISSUE-95 Warning Posted :-) (Saturday, 23 January)
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 (Friday, 22 January)
• ISSUE-23 implicit scopeClass text updated (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-117 (non-classes as classes): sh:class should not require that its objects be known to be instances of rdfs:Class [SHACL - Core] (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule (Tuesday, 19 January)
• ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 (Tuesday, 19 January)
• ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: ISSUE-78 Discussions (Tuesday, 19 January)
• ISSUE-49 Resolution added to spec (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: AW: SHACL Rules? (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 7 January 2015 (Thursday, 7 January)
• Further Response to Eric's Comment on ISSUE-49 (Thursday, 7 January)
• followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) (Thursday, 7 January)
• ISSUE-115: Closeness is an aspect of a Shape, but the current syntax treats it like all other constraints. (Thursday, 7 January)

arthur.ryman@gmail.com

• Re: definition of validation including scopes and filters (Friday, 8 January)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-49) (Thursday, 7 January)
• followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-43) (Thursday, 7 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ (Friday, 1 January)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications (Saturday, 30 January)
• ISSUE-95: What should go into which Turtle file? (Saturday, 30 January)
• Re: Constraints metamodel draft (Saturday, 30 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] (Saturday, 30 January)
• Any update on ISSUE-92? (Saturday, 30 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: Europeana SHACL tests (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 28 January 2016 (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 27 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Sunday, 24 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 January)
• ISSUE-115: Spec updated (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: inheritance & reuse (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-117 (non-classes as classes): sh:class should not require that its objects be known to be instances of rdfs:Class [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: inheritance & reuse (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Monday, 18 January)
• Re: inheritance & reuse (Saturday, 16 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class (Friday, 15 January)
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: ISSUE-115: Did we rush this decision? (Thursday, 14 January)
• ISSUE-115: Did we rush this decision? (Thursday, 14 January)
• Re: problem with test suite harness (Tuesday, 12 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Monday, 11 January)
• Spec editing "up to date" (Monday, 11 January)
• ISSUE-23: Dropped sh:ShapeClass, elaborated on sh:scopeClass rule (Monday, 11 January)
• ISSUE-104: Implemented resolution (Saturday, 9 January)
• Implemented resolution to ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications) (Saturday, 9 January)

Iovka Boneva

• Re: question about ShEx (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: question about ShEx (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: question about ShEx (Monday, 4 January)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Where should we query for class and subClassOf? (Wednesday, 20 January)

Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken

• Re: inheritance & reuse (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: inheritance & reuse (Tuesday, 19 January)
• Re: inheritance & reuse (Sunday, 17 January)
• inheritance & reuse (Friday, 15 January)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ (Saturday, 2 January)
• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ (Friday, 1 January)

Karen Coyle

• Europeana SHACL tests (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Monday, 25 January)
• Questions on Use Cases (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Next version of UCR (Wednesday, 13 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• request to be able to push into the test suite (Thursday, 28 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 25 January)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: ISSUE-23 implicit scopeClass text updated (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: Questions on Use Cases (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 (Thursday, 21 January)
• Re: ISSUE-22 and ISSUE-23 (Wednesday, 20 January)
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class (Saturday, 16 January)
• Re: when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class (Friday, 15 January)
• automatic checks on github (Thursday, 14 January)
• when is a node a class, when is a node a shape, when is a node an instance of a class (Thursday, 14 January)
• test case approval (Monday, 11 January)
• problem with test suite harness (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Monday, 11 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Sunday, 10 January)
• getting SHACL testing harness to work (Saturday, 9 January)
• Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• definition of validation including scopes and filters (Friday, 8 January)
• proposed set of SHACL tests (Thursday, 7 January)
• Re: question about ShEx (Thursday, 7 January)
• complete definition of Shape Expressions (Wednesday, 6 January)
• single-type semantics for ShEx (Wednesday, 6 January)
• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: question about ShEx (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: question about ShEx (Monday, 4 January)
• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ (Friday, 1 January)
• Re: Analysis of Example in ShEx paper submitted to SWJ (Friday, 1 January)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-120 (shape-class-instance-defs): The spec must be more precise and consist about when a resource is a shape, a class, and an instance of a class [SHACL - Core] (Thursday, 28 January)
• shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] (Wednesday, 27 January)
• shapes-ISSUE-118 (syntax errors): syntax errors should not be confusable with validation results [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 11 January)
• shapes-ISSUE-117 (non-classes as classes): sh:class should not require that its objects be known to be instances of rdfs:Class [SHACL - Core] (Monday, 11 January)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-119 (rdf:Lists): Defining constraints on (values of) rdf:Lists [SHACL - Core] (Friday, 29 January)
• Re: 3rd UCR WD published! (Friday, 29 January)
• 3rd UCR WD published! (Friday, 22 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 15 January)
• AW: Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Sunday, 10 January)
• Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)
• Re: proposed set of SHACL tests (Friday, 8 January)

Xueyuan Jia

• Call for Exclusions (Update): Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) (Monday, 11 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 January 2016 06:49:14 UTC