AW: Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests

You have to expand the node in the junit view on the LHS and klick on the one at the  very bottom.
simon

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> 
Datum: 10.01.2016  02:01  (GMT+01:00) 
An: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> 
Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org> 
Betreff: Re: AW: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests 

I expect that this is because the test harness requires a different namespace
than in the documentation.

I modified my file, and I now have my tests being run, but no output comes
out, either because of a logging problem or because JUnit is putting the
output someplace I can't find.

peter


On 01/08/2016 12:39 PM, Simon Steyskal wrote:
> I ran it through eclipse, the dependencies should be taken care of by maven.
> 
> I also merged your manifest.ttl with the one in features/core because (for
> whatever reason) the tests weren't loaded when I included them using
> mf:include <tests/manifest.ttl> ; in the top-level manifest.ttl
> 
> simon
> 
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
> 
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
> 
> Am 2016-01-08 21:01, schrieb Peter F. Patel-Schneider:
>> How did you run WGTest.java?  (I presume that that's the file to run.)
>>
>> Is there an easy way to get all the needed dependencies set up?
>>
>> peter
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/2016 07:44 AM, Simon Steyskal wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'll send you the files once I'm back home. No it's pretty easy, I merged your
>>> manifest.ttl with one of Holger's and ran WGTests.java.
>>>
>>> After fixing typos and the "mf:results false" bug, everything worked fine.
>>>
>>> simon
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>>> Von: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
>>> Datum: 08.01.2016 16:23 (GMT+01:00)
>>> An: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
>>> Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
>>> Betreff: Re: proposed set of SHACL tests
>>>
>>> Thanks Simon.
>>>
>>> How much work was it to set up everything?
>>>
>>> peter