- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:37:55 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Arthur, all, as I am working on the new metamodel draft (see [1] for references) I am wondering about where to draw the lines between the files. My original understanding was: 1) RDFS file defining all terms in RDF Schema only (classes, properties, ranges, domains) 2) SHACL file extending the schema with SHACL constraints (details of properties) Questions: a) Where shall the vocabulary of the extension mechanism go (e.g. sh:sparql, functions). We could either add them to the RDFS file or limit them to the SHACL file. The latter option may reduce the controversies (some people are really just interested in the core language anyway). b) Shall the SHACL file also contain the SPARQL queries? I have no strong opinion here, as we could inject the SPARQL queries from a third file maintained outside of the WG, as long as we have stable URIs for the subjects. Thanks, Holger [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2016 06:38:30 UTC