- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:48:28 -0500
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Holger, Note that I changed it to a SELECT. I am OK leaving it in. It may help people understand the prose. -- Arthur On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > Thanks, Arthur. Looks good to me. Now that we have the detailed paragraph > about how to recognize shapes and classes, I don't think we need the SPARQL > query anymore? > > Holger > > > On 20/01/2016 5:31 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote: >> >> Holger, >> >> I've edited the spec, phrasing this as part of how class-based scopes >> are computed. No mention of inferencing. >> >> -- Arthur >> >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Holger Knublauch >> <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: >>> >>> As resolved recently, I have dropped sh:ShapeClass from the spec (and the >>> test cases). >>> >>> To clarify the compromise that I am supporting, I have rewritten parts of >>> section 2.1.2 >>> >>> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#scopeClass >>> >>> This now includes a SPARQL query that shows how the implicit >>> sh:scopeClass >>> triples can be inferred prior to running the validation, on the shapes >>> graph. >>> >>> I welcome further discussion on that. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Holger >>> >>> > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 03:48:57 UTC