- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:30:14 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I believe ISSUE-92 is the last major ticket that would impact the syntax of SHACL. Months ago Arthur had made a proposal using what he called partitioning. To me this sounds like the most realistic starting point for a compromise. The last time I looked the question was raised whether Arthur's design would cover the use cases from the ShEx proponents. Are there any news on this front, and how do we proceed with this issue? Thanks Holger https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Proposals#ISSUE-92:_additive_repeated_properties
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2016 01:30:49 UTC