W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > January 2016

ISSUE-115: Closeness is an aspect of a Shape, but the current syntax treats it like all other constraints.

From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:37:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAApBiOnXib8bsrtDX9ugJBSRaL4z+GPJHK2V3B6AbR0wCa+mEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>

As per my action from today's telecon, I have updated ISSUE-115 and
added the two design alternatives I proposed to it.

-- Arthur

Received on Thursday, 7 January 2016 20:37:29 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "proposed set of SHACL tests"
Previous message: Dimitris Kontokostas: "followup questions to Arthur's proposal regarding scope/filter (ISSUE-43)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:28 UTC