public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from November 2015 by subject

ACTION-29 "Recursion in RDF Data Shape Languages" v2

ACTION-29 Issues found in your draft of Core SHACL Semantics

ACTION-29 Z Specification for the W3C Editor's Draft Core SHACL Semantics

Are we running out of time?

Are we running out of time? (was: shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec])

Can we freeze the Tracker for while?

connecting ISSUE-65 (Nomenclature) to other issues

Constraints metamodel draft (was: ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications)

Core SHACL Semantics http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/

Document: requirements -> SHACL

Interaction between minCount and hasValue

ISSUE-112: Proposal using sh:name and sh:description

ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft

ISSUE-23: Another attempt to compromise

ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace?

ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all?

ISSUE-92: Possible compromise

ISSUE-95: Proposal for model simplifications

ISSUE-95: Proposed simplification and clean up of template mechanism

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 12 November 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 19 November 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 5 November 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 12 November 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 November 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 29 October 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 5 November 2015

Regrets for next 2 weeks

Shape Expressions Schemas (was Re: ISSUE-22 Recursion - Status of Core SHACL Semantics draft)

shapes-ACTION-30: Send email to group with unclear "satisfied by's"

shapes-ACTION-31: Create shacl-vocab.ttl and generate HTML as per resolution of ISSUE-87

shapes-ISSUE-103 (Syntax simplifications): Can we further simplify the syntax of some constraint types? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-104 (Union ranges): Should sh:datatype and sh:class have better support for OR? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-109 (function calling): SHACL requires that SPARQL implementations be able to call functions defined on the fly [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-110 (single-property constraints): relationship between sh:constraint and sh:property and sh:inverseProperty

shapes-ISSUE-111 (charter issues): How should the working group address the issues called out in the WG charter?

shapes-ISSUE-112 (misuse of RDFS properties): SHACL uses RDFS properties in ways that violate their intended RDFS meaning [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-113 (SHACL and user interfaces): [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-114 (Property Groups): Should SHACL include a grouping mechanism of properties (for UI purposes) [SHACL Spec]

UI/UX snippets

well-formed Shape Expressions Schemas

Last message date: Friday, 27 November 2015 13:32:14 UTC