- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 09:18:19 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 11/14/2015 6:52, Karen Coyle wrote: > And note that some of the use case specifics, such as wanting to mark > properties as read-only, have not been incorporated into SHACL, but > without discussion. Those who want sh:readOnly in the language should make a proposal. I would not be against that. Like the other UI features, I imagine this requires no testing because it has no semantic consequences and is entirely optional. Holger
Received on Friday, 13 November 2015 23:18:57 UTC