- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 09:24:18 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Peter, Good point. Will do. -- Arthur On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > The date on this document is 3 November 2015. However, it states in Section > 7.3 that there are three competing proposals for SHACL. This has not been the > case for quite some time now. I suggest that you update this section. > > peter > > > On 11/04/2015 03:09 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote: >> I posted v2 of my proposal for recursion that just involves >> sh:valueShape and sh:and. [1] I've improved the text and added a >> couple of diagrams. >> >> This kind of recursion is what can be expressed with OSLC Resource >> Shapes. It is a subset of what can be expressed with SHACL. >> >> [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04972 >> >> -- Arthur >>
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 14:24:46 UTC