- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:10:50 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
I had tried my latest version from https://github.com/TopQuadrant/shacl/blob/master/src/main/resources/etc/shacl.ttl Holger On 11/3/2015 15:24, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I'm not sure what file you are talking about? > > The SHACL Vocabulary description linked to from the WG Wiki home page is > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/56429ef268a14e29586244ab944b310ea84cbf46/shacl/shacl.shacl.ttl > > > The file I get from this location does not have the string "AbstractResult" in > it at all. > > peter > > > On 11/02/2015 08:35 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> On 11/3/2015 14:04, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> I just loaded the file pointed at from the WG home page into Protege 5.0.0. >>> No problems loading or classifying, but of course there isn't much that an OWL >>> reasoner does with it. >>> >>> What part of RDF does the OWL API not support? >> To see some of the problems, re-save the shacl file with Protege. Then compare >> it with the original triples. There are all kinds of changes, e.g. >> rdfs:Classes suddenly have become owl:Classes and owl:NamedIndividual. Some >> triples seem to have just disappeared (e.g. sh:optionalWhenInherited, >> sh:maxCount at sh:AbstractResult, the sh:constraint at sh:Argument). >> >> See the attached screenshot of an example diff. >> >> HTH >> Holger >>
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 06:11:46 UTC