- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:21:04 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Peter, I looked at github [1]. The last edit was by Iovka on May 18. Therefore ReSpec is using the current date when you view it (possibly cached for a while). [1] https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commits/gh-pages/semantics/index.html -- Arthur On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > The date I see on http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ is 29 October > 2015. Is this document under active development, or is this just a bad > artifact of ReSpec? > > The document points at http://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-semantics/ as the latest > published version. As far as I know, there has been no decision by the working > group to publish this document as an official W3C publication or even any > decision to work towards such a publication. > > The publication status of this document in its "Status of This Document" is > incorrect as far as I can tell. I am not aware of any decision by the working > group to publish it as an Editor's Draft. > > > All these may be bad artifacts of using ReSpec. The net result, however, is > that readers may gain an incorrect view of the status of the document and of > the deliberations of the working group. Either the document should be removed > or there should be big bold flashing red warnings indicating that some of the > status information is incorrect any only an artifact of ReSpec. > > > peter > > > PS: Why should the working group care about this? The document is being > referenced in archived documents that people outside the working group may > come across and these people may in turn read this document and get a false > impression of what is happening in the working group. >
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2015 16:21:32 UTC