- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 06:17:27 -0500
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I just posted a complete Z specification for the Core SHACL Semantics draft written by Iovka and Eric. [1] This document is much longer than the draft because it spells out every concept in detail. I did this formalization to help me understood their proposed semantics for recursion involving sh:not and sh:or. My conclusion is that their proposal is well-founded, but due to its complexity it is not clear that it corresponds with one's intuition. More seriously, I found some issues and have listed them in [1]. I need Iovka or Eric to address these issues before I can go further with their draft. [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00384 -- Arthur
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 11:17:55 UTC