- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 20:04:05 -0800
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I just loaded the file pointed at from the WG home page into Protege 5.0.0. No problems loading or classifying, but of course there isn't much that an OWL reasoner does with it. What part of RDF does the OWL API not support? peter On 11/02/2015 03:22 PM, Karen Coyle wrote: > Oh, no, I agree, one software program should not dictate the design of SHACL. > > kc > > On 11/1/15 8:29 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> On 11/2/2015 14:17, Karen Coyle wrote: >>> Well, I have to say that I have not been successful in loading >>> SHACL.SHACL.ttl directly into tools such as Protege >> >> Protege is based on the OWL API. The OWL API is not based on RDF and >> does not fully support RDF. The limitations of one open source project >> should not dictate the design of SHACL. It is unlikely that trying to >> use vanilla Protege for editing Shapes will be realistic. A proper SHACL >> plugin for Protege will hopefully be created at some stage. Oh wait... >> >> http://me-at-big.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/shacl4p-shapes-constraint-language.html >> >> >> >> Holger >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 04:04:35 UTC