- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:24:24 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
I'm not sure what file you are talking about? The SHACL Vocabulary description linked to from the WG Wiki home page is https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/56429ef268a14e29586244ab944b310ea84cbf46/shacl/shacl.shacl.ttl The file I get from this location does not have the string "AbstractResult" in it at all. peter On 11/02/2015 08:35 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > On 11/3/2015 14:04, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> I just loaded the file pointed at from the WG home page into Protege 5.0.0. >> No problems loading or classifying, but of course there isn't much that an OWL >> reasoner does with it. >> >> What part of RDF does the OWL API not support? > > To see some of the problems, re-save the shacl file with Protege. Then compare > it with the original triples. There are all kinds of changes, e.g. > rdfs:Classes suddenly have become owl:Classes and owl:NamedIndividual. Some > triples seem to have just disappeared (e.g. sh:optionalWhenInherited, > sh:maxCount at sh:AbstractResult, the sh:constraint at sh:Argument). > > See the attached screenshot of an example diff. > > HTH > Holger >
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 05:24:54 UTC