Re: ACTION-29 Z Specification for the W3C Editor's Draft Core SHACL Semantics

Peter,

I agree with your assessment. The wiki page should also be updated to
indicate the status. I've asked Iovka what her plans are.

-- Arthur

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> This document is dated 3 November 2015.
>
> Its title is "Z Specification for the W3C Editor’s Draft Core
> SHACL Semantics".  The document that this refers to is
> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/.  As far as I know, the draft core
> SHACL semantics document has no official standing in the W3C Data Shapes
> Working Group, and is no longer under consideration in the working group.  I
> suggest that this document be revised to make this point clear lest readers
> get an incorrect view of the working group's progress.
>
> peter
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/04/2015 03:17 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote:
>> I just posted a complete Z specification for the Core SHACL Semantics
>> draft written by Iovka and Eric. [1] This document is much longer than
>> the draft because it spells out every concept in detail.
>>
>> I did this formalization to help me understood their proposed
>> semantics for recursion involving sh:not and sh:or. My conclusion is
>> that their proposal is well-founded, but due to its complexity it is
>> not clear that it corresponds with one's intuition. More seriously, I
>> found some issues and have listed them in [1]. I need Iovka or Eric to
>> address these issues before I can go further with their draft.
>>
>> [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00384
>>
>> -- Arthur
>>

Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 15:33:38 UTC