www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from January to March 2008 by author

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 5549] datatypes not ·ordered·, but ordered {value} is partial (Monday, 10 March)
• [Bug 5062] what facets apply to union? (Sunday, 9 March)
• [Bug 5062] what facets apply to union? (Sunday, 9 March)
• [Bug 5550] references to fundamental facets (Sunday, 9 March)
• [Bug 5549] datatypes not ·ordered·, but ordered {value} is partial (Sunday, 9 March)
• [Bug 5062] what facets apply to union? (Sunday, 9 March)
• [Bug 1917] RQ-140: distinguish negative from positive zero in float and double (Requirement) (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 1913] RQ-120: use the term 'derived' consistently (Structures) (Desideratum) (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 2044] R-198: ensure that unions of unions retain union-level facets (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 5194] Editorial comments on section 3.4.2 (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 5141] small editorial changes section 3.4-3.6 (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 5144] small editorial changes section 3.8.6-3.15.1 (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 4276] Namespace Constraint Property Record problems (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 5139] small editorial changes sections 3.0-3.2 (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 5137] small editorial changes sections 0-2 (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 5231] name xpath subset used in identity constraint selectors (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 3249] Constants (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 5286] Component constraints within XML representation constraints (Saturday, 8 March)
• [Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial) (Friday, 7 March)
• [Bug 5262] Incorrect link to S4SD (Thursday, 6 March)
• [Bug 5535] Definition of [nil] is wrong (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 2337] Add {context} property to simple type definition in Datatypes (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1929] RQ-141e: Make pattern value be a set of regexes, not one regex (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1917] RQ-140: distinguish negative from positive zero in float and double (Requirement) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1912] RQ-31e: remove lexicalMappings facet (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1907] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for float and double (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1853] RQ-141b define and use "ancestor" in mapping rules for simple type defns (Requirement) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1852] RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1843] RQ-141b: Editing intro paragraphs of Datatypes Sec 2 (Requirement) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1926] EP-14: define 'literal' and use it more consistently (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1925] EP-01: clarify complex property values and component classes (Datatypes) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1919] RQ-150c: set minimum implementation reqs for precisionDecimal (Requirement) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1918] RQ-150b: set minimum implementation reqs for decimal (Requirement) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1903] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for boolean (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1902] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for string (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 1836] RQ-100 define canonical form for language type, update RFC reference (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 5162] wildcard notQname=defined (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 5161] all model group min/maxoccurs confusing (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 5160] all group info in odd place (Wednesday, 5 March)
• [Bug 5281] Why allow an element to be valid against a declaration with the wrong name? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5273] xpathDefaultNamespace on identity constraints (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5282] UPA and overlapping substitution groups (Tuesday, 4 March)
• [Bug 5229] Definition of xs:double (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 5322] Nonterminal "Char" has two productions (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 4764] delete words appropriate for leap-seconds (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 3224] Inequality (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 3950] {fixed} is redundant for length (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 5157] 3.4.2 example unclear (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 5512] Definition of valid schema document is incomplete (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment (Thursday, 28 February)
• [Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 3950] {fixed} is redundant for length (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 4764] delete words appropriate for leap-seconds (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 5229] Definition of xs:double (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 5322] Nonterminal "Char" has two productions (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 3224] Inequality (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 4764] delete words appropriate for leap-seconds (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 5229] Definition of xs:double (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 5504] Annotations can vary in an extension? Why? (Tuesday, 26 February)
• [Bug 3892] 3.4.1 ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl. (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 3891] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial) (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 3220] Terminology: "must" (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 3220] Terminology: "must" (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 3220] Terminology: "must" (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5487] Special status of namespaces xs, xsi, xml etc (Monday, 18 February)
• [Bug 5487] Special status of namespaces xs, xsi, xml etc (Monday, 18 February)
• [Bug 5486] Regex: Names of Unicode code blocks (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5486] Regex: Names of Unicode code blocks (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5486] Regex: Names of Unicode code blocks (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5162] wildcard notQname=defined (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5161] all model group min/maxoccurs confusing (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5160] all group info in odd place (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5157] 3.4.2 example unclear (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5146] small editorial changes missing blanks multiple sections (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5142] small editorial changes section 3.8.4 (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 2218] R-226: Must the content of schemaLocation be a resolvable URL? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 3220] Terminology: "must" (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Bug 5244] Move co-constraints into types (Sunday, 10 February)
• [Bug 5079] Type tables and substitution groups (Sunday, 10 February)
• [Bug 5077] Use of "le" in assertion test (Sunday, 10 February)
• [Bug 5076] Comparator modification not apparent (Sunday, 10 February)
• [Bug 5072] minor editorial issues (Sunday, 10 February)
• [Bug 5052] S4S: unresolved type for attributes test declared within "assertion" and "altType" (Saturday, 9 February)
• [Bug 5053] S4S: Issues on the complex type definition "altType" (Saturday, 9 February)
• [Bug 5004] 2007-08-30 WD: inconsistency between type keybase of S4S and Section 3.11.3 (icd representation) (Saturday, 9 February)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Saturday, 9 February)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5263] Errors in the S4SD (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5077] Use of "le" in assertion test (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3892] 3.4.1 ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl. (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5470] 3.4.1 ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl. (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2842] RQ-134 Origin of inherited portions of content model (scd-origin-inheritance) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3724] Rule "Content type restricts" needs clarification (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2195] R-202: How many components are there for complextype extensions? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5162] wildcard notQname=defined (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5266] XSDL? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5274] Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2811] align use of 'atomic' with part 2 (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2828] RQ-155 State prohibition of use attribute on top-level attributes more clearly (topleveluse) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5160] all group info in odd place (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4202] Add a note to clarify validity of partial "unique" values (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4280] Add example(s) to show how idc references work (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4368] Editorial: what does "the appropriate case ... is true" mean? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5193] Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2309] Clarify identity of values across related simple types (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5072] minor editorial issues (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5076] Comparator modification not apparent (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5469] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5469] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5468] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3891] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2947] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: what makes an order trivial? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5467] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5467] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5466] Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are pointless (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2311] Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are pointless (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5029] Editorial: repeated word (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5059] XDM should be referenced normatively (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2218] R-226: Must the content of schemaLocation be a resolvable URL? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4398] XML declaration appears after DocType in appendix A (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2162] R-165: Clarification requested for statement in Appendix H of Structures (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5146] small editorial changes missing blanks multiple sections (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5161] all model group min/maxoccurs confusing (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5265] Interchangeable use of "xs" and "xsd" prefixes (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5052] S4S: unresolved type for attributes test declared within "assertion" and "altType" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5004] 2007-08-30 WD: inconsistency between type keybase of S4S and Section 3.11.3 (icd representation) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5053] S4S: Issues on the complex type definition "altType" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5142] small editorial changes section 3.8.4 (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2082] R-092: Clarification required for group redefinition (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3963] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4518] inaccurate description of PSVI in 3.16.5 (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5465] Bug in anchor for documentation of hexBinary type (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4839] Bug in anchor for documentation of hexBinary type (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4839] Bug in anchor for documentation of hexBinary type (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2947] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: what makes an order trivial? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2947] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: what makes an order trivial? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3249] Constants (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4900] typo in 4.3.1.4 (need quantifier) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4089] Some RFCs in "normative references" are not used (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3265] Length facet for QNames (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3266] "Current schema" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3869] Annotation mapping for simple type and facets (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4986] typo in "3.4.3 language" Note (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4912] Allow empty unions (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3256] BC dates (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4033] "(constraining) facets" section missing for "date" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3840] Mistaken id in appendix C.1: string.preserve (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4368] Editorial: what does "the appropriate case ... is true" mean? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2842] RQ-134 Origin of inherited portions of content model (scd-origin-inheritance) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3892] 3.4.1 ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl. (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5146] small editorial changes missing blanks multiple sections (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5263] Errors in the S4SD (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5161] all model group min/maxoccurs confusing (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5076] Comparator modification not apparent (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5265] Interchangeable use of "xs" and "xsd" prefixes (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5142] small editorial changes section 3.8.4 (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5077] Use of "le" in assertion test (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5072] minor editorial issues (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5059] XDM should be referenced normatively (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5052] S4S: unresolved type for attributes test declared within "assertion" and "altType" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5053] S4S: Issues on the complex type definition "altType" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5004] 2007-08-30 WD: inconsistency between type keybase of S4S and Section 3.11.3 (icd representation) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5029] Editorial: repeated word (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3963] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4518] inaccurate description of PSVI in 3.16.5 (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 4398] XML declaration appears after DocType in appendix A (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3891] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial) (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2311] Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are pointless (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2218] R-226: Must the content of schemaLocation be a resolvable URL? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2162] R-165: Clarification requested for statement in Appendix H of Structures (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 2082] R-092: Clarification required for group redefinition (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3892] 3.4.1 ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl. (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3265] Length facet for QNames (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4986] typo in "3.4.3 language" Note (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3869] Annotation mapping for simple type and facets (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3840] Mistaken id in appendix C.1: string.preserve (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4912] Allow empty unions (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3256] BC dates (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4900] typo in 4.3.1.4 (need quantifier) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4089] Some RFCs in "normative references" are not used (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 2947] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: what makes an order trivial? (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3266] "Current schema" (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4033] "(constraining) facets" section missing for "date" (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4839] Bug in anchor for documentation of hexBinary type (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 5193] Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 5274] Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 5266] XSDL? (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 5160] all group info in odd place (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4280] Add example(s) to show how idc references work (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3724] Rule "Content type restricts" needs clarification (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 4202] Add a note to clarify validity of partial "unique" values (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 2195] R-202: How many components are there for complextype extensions? (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 2811] align use of 'atomic' with part 2 (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 5162] wildcard notQname=defined (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 2828] RQ-155 State prohibition of use attribute on top-level attributes more clearly (topleveluse) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 2309] Clarify identity of values across related simple types (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5160] all group info in odd place (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5141] small editorial changes section 3.4-3.6 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5265] Interchangeable use of "xs" and "xsd" prefixes (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 3963] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5137] small editorial changes sections 0-2 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 4398] XML declaration appears after DocType in appendix A (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5146] small editorial changes missing blanks multiple sections (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 3891] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5193] Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5167] misc editorial (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial) (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 4518] inaccurate description of PSVI in 3.16.5 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5274] Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5142] small editorial changes section 3.8.4 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5004] 2007-08-30 WD: inconsistency between type keybase of S4S and Section 3.11.3 (icd representation) (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 4276] Namespace Constraint Property Record problems (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5139] small editorial changes sections 3.0-3.2 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5072] minor editorial issues (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 4202] Add a note to clarify validity of partial "unique" values (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5162] wildcard notQname=defined (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5059] XDM should be referenced normatively (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5262] Incorrect link to S4SD (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 2311] Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are pointless (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5144] small editorial changes section 3.8.6-3.15.1 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5029] Editorial: repeated word (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5052] S4S: unresolved type for attributes test declared within "assertion" and "altType" (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5345] Split SCC: Derivation Valid (Extension) into 2 parts (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5150] unclear if some prose is normative or non-normative (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5231] name xpath subset used in identity constraint selectors (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5194] Editorial comments on section 3.4.2 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5077] Use of "le" in assertion test (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5195] Editorial comments on section 3.4.4 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5145] small editorial changes section 4.2.4-5.2 (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5158] discuss general name/ref pattern up front (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5273] xpathDefaultNamespace on identity constraints (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5281] Why allow an element to be valid against a declaration with the wrong name? (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 4850] Update of reference for language data type (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 2576] Clarify relation of language type to xml:lang (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 2576] Clarify relation of language type to xml:lang (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 2439] ChecK new RFC 3066 bis (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3079] RFC3066 ref (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 4850] Update of reference for language data type (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3244] Sets of lists (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3228] Lists|Unions of Lists|Unions (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3237] Relationship to programming language types (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3244] Sets of lists (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3230] Atomic = not decomposable? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3237] Relationship to programming language types (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3230] Atomic = not decomposable? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 3249] Constants (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 5436] Editorial: replace 'attributed to' with 'bound to' ? (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 5436] Editorial: replace 'attributed to' with 'bound to' ? (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 5435] The term "valid schema" is used but not defined (Monday, 28 January)
• [Bug 5023] Relationship between identity constraints and assertions (Monday, 28 January)
• [Bug 5431] Normal characters, character references (Sunday, 27 January)
• [Bug 5431] Normal characters, character references (Saturday, 26 January)
• [Bug 5431] Normal characters, character references (Saturday, 26 January)
• [Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial) (Saturday, 26 January)
• [Bug 5427] Primer materials within the Structures Rec (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5426] Revisit whether or allow partial XPath implementation (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5425] Revise Composition (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5425] Revise Composition (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 2069] R-079: Ambiguity in statements about valid type derivation (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 4336] Another occurrence of nested modals (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 4336] Another occurrence of nested modals (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 3963] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 4470] Editorial work in "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 3963] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)" (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5258] Garbled text (? or other problem?) in Str 3.5.4 Attribute locally valid (use) (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5289] "##defined" in wildcards (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5193] Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial) (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5155] 3.3.2 XML Representation of Element Declaration Schema Components (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5153] 3.2.2 XML Representation of Attribute Declaration Schema Components (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5153] 3.2.2 XML Representation of Attribute Declaration Schema Components (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5149] normative format rfc2119 keywords used in non-normative notes (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5157] 3.4.2 example unclear (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5079] Type tables and substitution groups (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5168] vc:maxVersion versioning (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5168] vc:maxVersion versioning (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5127] Missing NOTATION component (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5274] Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5150] unclear if some prose is normative or non-normative (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5297] Drop restriction of assertions to down-pointing XPaths? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5244] Move co-constraints into types (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5244] Move co-constraints into types (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5293] Subsumption (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5286] Component constraints within XML representation constraints (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5266] XSDL? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5163] schemalocation needs to be cleaned up and clarified (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5078] define required components (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5286] Component constraints within XML representation constraints (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5164] validation vs assessment (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5281] Why allow an element to be valid against a declaration with the wrong name? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5281] Why allow an element to be valid against a declaration with the wrong name? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5282] UPA and overlapping substitution groups (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5296] An oddity with substitution groups (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5273] xpathDefaultNamespace on identity constraints (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5412] Is lax assessment required after "missing sub-component"? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 5345] Split SCC: Derivation Valid (Extension) into 2 parts (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 5023] Relationship between identity constraints and assertions (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 5023] Relationship between identity constraints and assertions (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 5030] Assertions on simple types (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 5126] Assertions: usability (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 5412] Is lax assessment required after "missing sub-component"? (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 3251] how to introduce primitives (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 5396] What EBNF is used? (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Friday, 18 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Friday, 18 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 4850] Update of reference for language data type (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 5378] [SCD] XML representation of schema components (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5378] [SCD] XML representation of schema components (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5377] Requirement for metadata querying (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5377] Requirement for metadata querying (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5376] [SCD] Richer extension story (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5376] [SCD] Richer extension story (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5375] [SCD] Regularize the grammar (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5375] [SCD] Regularize the grammar (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 2824] RQ-151 Define schema composition (composition) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5374] [SCD] Crisp identity conditions (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5374] [SCD] Crisp identity conditions (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5373] [SCD] Define accessors (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5373] [SCD] Define accessors (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5372] Define bridge functions (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5372] Define bridge functions (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5371] [SCD] Eliminate notion of 'elided steps' (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5371] [SCD] Eliminate notion of 'elided steps' (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 2660] lc-3: QA review of XML Schema: Component Designators (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 3677] [SCD] Numeric predicates confusing (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 2662] lc-5: Rule out default namespace (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 3682] [SCD] ModelGroupStep production error (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 2658] lc-1 : rfc2396bis (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 3681] [SCD] missing component::* from BNF (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 3683] [SCD] Allow for ./ in paths (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 3684] [SCD] // confusing (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5320] [SCD] Rename element:: and attribute:: axes (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 4449] How do you write an empty namespace prefix? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 3855] Use of "Default Axis" versus XPath (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 3685] [SCD] (Editorial) Origanize by axes (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 14 January)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 14 January)
• [Bug 5161] all model group min/maxoccurs confusing (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 5353] Do "path" etc. apply to model groups or particles or content models? (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 5238] Resolution to bug 2850 needs additional example - key/keyref (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 4280] Add example(s) to show how idc references work (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 2753] wd-27: Errors in component diagram (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 2753] wd-27: Errors in component diagram (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 5321] REs are not production nonterminals (Monday, 7 January)
• [Bug 5321] REs are not production nonterminals (Sunday, 6 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Sunday, 6 January)
• [Bug 5321] REs are not production nonterminals (Sunday, 6 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Sunday, 6 January)
• [Bug 5321] REs are not production nonterminals (Sunday, 6 January)
• [Bug 3251] need for precisionDecimal / how to introduce primitives (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 3251] need for precisionDecimal / how to introduce primitives (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5345] Split SCC: Derivation Valid (Extension) into 2 parts (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5193] Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5195] Editorial comments on section 3.4.4 (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5193] Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial) (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5168] vc:maxVersion versioning (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5157] 3.4.2 example unclear (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 5149] normative format rfc2119 keywords used in non-normative notes (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 5150] unclear if some prose is normative or non-normative (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 5149] normative format rfc2119 keywords used in non-normative notes (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 5052] S4S: unresolved type for attributes test declared within "assertion" and "altType" (Wednesday, 2 January)
• [Bug 5079] Type tables and substitution groups (Tuesday, 1 January)
• [Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited (Tuesday, 1 January)
• [Bug 5077] Use of "le" in assertion test (Tuesday, 1 January)
• [Bug 5075] use of "ad" as an ID vs. ad blockers (Tuesday, 1 January)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions (Tuesday, 25 March)
• !! in section 1.2 of XSD 1.1: Structures (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: [Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Bug 2218] R-226: Must the content of schemaLocation be a resolvable URL? (Wednesday, 13 February)

Dave Peterson

• Re: possible bug in XML Schema 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes (was Re: question about lexical and value spaces) (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: question about lexical and value spaces (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: question about lexical and value spaces (Wednesday, 9 January)

John Arwe

• Re: [Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions (Tuesday, 25 March)

Michael Kay

• RE: question about lexical and value spaces (Friday, 18 January)
• RE: question about lexical and value spaces (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: question about lexical and value spaces (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: Make more use of {base type definition} (Thursday, 3 January)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• RE: question about lexical and value spaces (Friday, 18 January)

Pete Cordell

• Re: [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: [Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand (Thursday, 3 January)
• Make more use of {base type definition} (Thursday, 3 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• possible bug in XML Schema 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes (was Re: question about lexical and value spaces) (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: question about lexical and value spaces (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: question about lexical and value spaces (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: question about lexical and value spaces (Wednesday, 9 January)
• question about lexical and value spaces (Wednesday, 9 January)

Pratul Dublish

• W3C SML and SML-IF 1.1 Last Call (Monday, 3 March)

Rod Hughes

• RE: Question on <openContent> and <anyAttribute> (Monday, 24 March)
• Question on <openContent> and <anyAttribute> (Friday, 7 March)

Sandy Gao

• Re: Question on <openContent> and <anyAttribute> (Wednesday, 19 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 25 March 2008 13:43:26 UTC