- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:21:23 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5192 ------- Comment #4 from davep@iit.edu 2008-01-26 01:21 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The WG instructs the editors: > 1) to widen the definition a little to fit current uses > 2) to mark uses with dots where appropriate Note that the dots (meaning a pointer to a definition) is different from the handling in part 2. In Datatypes, "absent" is a special value. There is no definition. How an implementation stores the value "absent" is up to the implementation; if it wishes to "store" that particular value by not storing a value, that's fine; if it wishes to store some internally recognizable bit-string, that's fine too. We don't say how any values must be stored. Shouldn't the two parts be harmonized?
Received on Saturday, 26 January 2008 01:21:33 UTC