W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2008

[Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:56:03 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JIVal-0004Te-DI@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5192


David_E3@VERIFONE.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |editorial




------- Comment #3 from David_E3@VERIFONE.com  2008-01-25 20:56 -------
The WG instructs the editors:
1) to widen the definition a little to fit current uses
2) to mark uses with dots where appropriate
3) fix typo in 3.10.2

There is some sentiment in the WG for revising some of the other uses of
"absent" but the ultimate consensus is to allow it to stand as is.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 20:56:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:12 GMT