[Bug 5281] Why allow an element to be valid against a declaration with the wrong name?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5281





------- Comment #2 from David_E3@VERIFONE.com  2008-01-24 19:00 -------
(aside response to comment #1)--
<MSM> I think the answer to MKay's question is that Validation Rule: Element
Sequence Accepted (Particle) rule 2.3.3 attributes (binds) the element
inforjmation item to the element declaration that bears its name, not the
element declaration in the particle.
<MSM> So we don't need to allow the substituting element to be valid against
the sulbstituted element declaration.

Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:00:41 UTC