- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:17:38 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1913
cmsmcq@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|major |normal
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Keywords|resolved |editorial, needsDrafting
Priority|P4 |P2
Resolution|FIXED |
Status Whiteboard| |terminology cluster
------- Comment #3 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-03-08 15:17 -------
The wording proposal adopted to resolve this issue appears to have
linked many occurrences of the string 'derived' to the definition in
the Datatypes spec, possibly all of them, but certainly more of them than
are in fact referring to the concept of type derivation as defined there.
All occurrences of the string need to be reviewed and selectively
unlinked from Datatypes (and possibly relinked to some more appropriate
target within the Structures spec).
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2008 15:17:46 UTC