W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2008

[Bug 5161] all model group min/maxoccurs confusing

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 02:18:30 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JWjDC-0007Hy-Ur@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Comment #7 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2008-03-05 02:18 -------
This is to confirm that the removal of the text about min- and maxOccurs
was indeed intentional.  (Like the contradictory statements which 
originally drew the intention of the originator of the bug report, that
text should have been updated when we made the change to all-groups.)

The typo you noticed in the syntax diagram for the 'all' element was
the result of a common XSLT coding error and has been corrected. (For 
those who will not be able to rest until they know:  the | or other 
connector is to be inserted just when the element or group is not the 
first item in its containing group.  The stylesheet was testing on 
position() and was accordingly wrong-footed by the insertion of a comment 
in an inopportune location in the XML source.  The stylesheet has been 
corrected to use count(preceding-sibling::*) and tests show that the 
syntax of the 'all' element is no longer troubled by the ghost bar.)

John, I think the ball is back in your court.
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 02:18:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:07 UTC