W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2008

[Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:06:23 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JAbx1-0007hy-Uc@wiggum.w3.org>


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
  Status Whiteboard|                            |medium, work, terminology
                   |                            |cluster, composition cluster

------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2008-01-04 02:06 -------
Note that this issue of the use of the term 'absent' (in particular, its
use to describe the presence or non-presence of particular declarations
in a schema) also touches on the problem of required (and non-required
components); see bug 5078.  

See also bug 5148 (also about the term 'absent', in a different context).
Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 02:06:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:12 GMT