[Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial)

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5192


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
  Status Whiteboard|                            |medium, work, terminology
                   |                            |cluster, composition cluster




------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2008-01-04 02:06 -------
Note that this issue of the use of the term 'absent' (in particular, its
use to describe the presence or non-presence of particular declarations
in a schema) also touches on the problem of required (and non-required
components); see bug 5078.  

See also bug 5148 (also about the term 'absent', in a different context).

Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 02:06:25 UTC