W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2008

[Bug 3891] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:39:42 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JNbsk-0008KJ-0v@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3891


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needsReview                 |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
            Version|1.0/1.1 both                |1.1 only




------- Comment #3 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2008-02-08 22:39 -------
The XML Schema Working Group today accepted the proposal mentioned in
comment #2, which is intended to resolve this issue by rephrasing the
rule as suggested.  For 

    2.1 restriction is not in the subset, or in the {final} of its
        own {base type definition};

the text now reads 

    2.1 restriction is not in the subset, or in the {final} of D's
        {base type definition};

With this change, the WG believes we have resolved this issue fully
for XSD 1.1.

Accordingly, I am going to 

   - change the status of this issue (3891) to RESOLVED - FIXED
   - clone this issue to track the corresponding problem in 1.0
   - set the status of that new issue accordingly, and add Daniel
     Barclay to the CC list for the new issue, as the originator of 
     this issue

Daniel Barclay, as the originator of this comment, you should receive
from Bugzilla an email notification of this decision.  Please accept
our thanks for catching this ambiguity.

Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by
adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the
issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please
add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision
to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to
Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the
record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we
will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 22:39:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:13 GMT