- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:59:03 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5396
Summary: What EBNF is used?
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0/1.1 both
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: editorial
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: davep@iit.edu
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
The spec appears to use the EBNF of the XML spec, but nowhere does it say so.
Since that particular EBNF grammar has some relatively uncommon components,
such as differences and "#xnn" representations of Unicode characters, we should
at least reference it. Or define it ourselves, if what we do is not really
identical.
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 03:59:10 UTC