W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2008

[Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:54:49 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JAQX3-0006UL-0V@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Comment #5 from xan.gregg@jmp.com  2008-01-03 13:54 -------
Thanks for correcting my schema -- yours is what I intended. Now I see I was
reading things too literally, and that saying a type is a restriction or
extension of another type was just meant as shorthand for the full definition
of valid derivation.

Though the section is introductory, I believe it is normative. The sentence in
question uses "MUST", so I appreciate any tightening you can add.
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 13:54:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:07 UTC