W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2008

[Bug 5436] Editorial: replace 'attributed to' with 'bound to' ?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:08:23 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JJmS7-0001XL-8g@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5436





------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com  2008-01-29 09:08 -------
I think bind/bound is somewhat overused: it's a very general word for a
relationship with very little information about the specific nature of the
relationship. Its use in the sense of "data binding" could create confusion.

There are words that are less overloaded with existing meanings. A glance at a
thesaurus suggests 

accredited, ascribed, imputed

Unique particle accreditation, anyone?
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 09:08:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:12 GMT