W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2008

[Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:23:45 +0000
CC:
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JNZlB-0002Vh-Sx@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3889


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needsReview                 |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #3 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2008-02-08 20:23 -------
The XML Schema Working Group today accepted a proposal to resolve this
issue (for XSD 1.1) by revising the paragraph.

Before the change, the paragraph read:

    An empty {substitution group exclusions} allows a declaration to
    be named in the {substitution group affiliations} of other element
    declarations having the same declared {type definition} or some
    type derived therefrom. The explicit values of {substitution group
    exclusions} rule out element declarations having types which are
    extensions or restrictions respectively of {type definition}.

After the change, the paragraph reads:

    An empty {substitution group exclusions} allows a declaration to
    be named in the {substitution group affiliations} of other element
    declarations having the same declared {type definition} or some
    type derived therefrom. The explicit values of {substitution group
    exclusions}, extension or restriction, rule out element
    declarations having types whose derivation from {type definition}
    involves any extension steps, or restriction steps, respectively.

Daniel Barclay, as the originator of this comment, you should receive
from Bugzilla an email notification of this decision.  Please accept
our thanks for catching this problem.

Please let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by
adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the
issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please
add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision
to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to
Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the
record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we
will assume you agree with the WG decision.

Note that a clone of this issue for XSD 1.0 has been created in 
bug 5467.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 20:23:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:13 GMT